Interim Housing: A New Perspective on Addressing Homelessness
For the past ten years, the prevailing strategy in the United States to combat homelessness has centered on the concept of permanent housing. The rationale is clear: only permanent housing can effectively eliminate homelessness. However, recent discussions suggest a paradigm shift towards the acceptance of interim housing as a viable solution. This article delves into the potential benefits and challenges associated with this approach.
The Shift in Focus
Advocates for homeless assistance argue that permanent housing, while essential, is not sufficient in the current landscape, particularly in states like California, where the cost of building such housing can exceed $800,000 per unit. Given these figures, a practical alternative must be sought.
Introducing Interim Supportive Housing
Interim supportive housing is posited as a dignified alternative to traditional shelters, which often fail to provide the stability individuals need to rebuild their lives. This model offers individuals a personal space—such as a small cabin or tiny room—classified as temporary housing, which meets their immediate needs while preventing the trauma associated with street living.
Funding Challenges
While interim housing is gaining attention, federal funding remains sparse. Most existing financial resources are allocated for permanent housing or competing initiatives. Organizations seeking to establish interim housing often rely on philanthropic contributions and state funding programs, such as the Encampment Resolution Funds and Project Homekey.
Investor Models and Tax Incentives
Some projects are exploring investment models, particularly given the unique classification of these cabins under tax codes. They are categorized as personal property, allowing investors to benefit from significant tax write-offs, including accelerated bonus depreciation, fostering greater financial participation in these initiatives.
Operational Costs and Funding Availability
Beyond initial construction costs, ongoing operational expenses for interim housing present an additional hurdle. Each unit may cost approximately $50,000 to build, yet an equal amount is necessary for yearly operation, complicating long-term budgeting for cities.
Some hope lies with California’s CalAIM program, which allows for Medicaid waivers that financially support various services in shelters and interim housing. This model demonstrates the potential benefits of integrating healthcare funding into homelessness solutions.
Section 8 Vouchers and Housing Choice
Despite the flexibility offered by Section 8 vouchers, they are typically incompatible with interim housing solutions. Advocates suggest that allowing these vouchers to be used for temporary housing could enhance stability for individuals in transition, yet this notion has prompted concerns about resource allocation among housing advocates.
Looking Ahead: The Vision for Interim Housing
In summary, the call for interim housing is not merely about expanding a service; it’s about rethinking our approach to homelessness on a national scale. Organizations are beginnging to develop comprehensive playbooks to guide municipalities in creating interim housing solutions. This proactive initiative aims to integrate interim housing into mainstream assistance strategies, ensuring that communities have access to actionable plans and resources.
The evolving landscape of homelessness in the United States necessitates innovative strategies that balance immediate needs with long-term goals. The journey towards effective interim housing solutions can be transformative, not only for individuals experiencing homelessness but also for the broader community.